Guest of the Admiral or not..

 

I’ve written fleetingly of my wife’s connection to the Guest family, something I plan to go into a bit more detail at a later date. A random mention of this connection on Bob‘s Facebook group lead to a conversation with Stefano Martini, drone cameraman extraordinaire of that parish (his aerial shots of the Mawddach estuary alone are worth looking him up, just spectacular). This conversation was about Dowlais ironworks where the Broseley abiding Guests decamped to en masse in the later 18th century according to records.

George_Childs_Dowlais_Ironworks_1840
Dowlais Ironworks 1840 by George Childs

John Guest moved from Broseley which is not too far from Coalbrookdale and all that invokes iron making wise, to South Wales in 1763, originally to start the Plymouth Ironworks. It wasnt a great success and within a couple of years the control was transferred to another man. However his work there caught the eye of the shareholders of the Dowlais works and he was appointed manager of the works in April 1767, he had by this time moved his wife and kids down to live with him as he had become withdrawn and melancholy without them in his early years in South Wales.

Things went well for him because by 1781 he was buying 7 of the 16 shares in the ironworks and employing many of his family in the works, my wife’s 4x Grt Grandfather Cornelius was his nephew and was employed at the works as a manager at a time when Johns son Thomas was running it. The works expanded massively as a result of the Napoleonic wars, which brings us to the title of this post, in 1802 none other than Admiral Horatio Nelson visited the ironworks to express his thanks for the work on producing cannon and shot to arm his ships. As a manager and a member of the owners family it is almost guaranteed that Cornelius Guest would have met Nelson himself….. at least that’s what I thought until I researched a bit more.

Everything I’ve said about the Guests is accurate, they moved down from Shropshire and built Dowlais into one of the most productive and successful Ironworks of the time. Nelson did visit Merthyr to thank the workers for the cannon and shot they produced for his fleet but, and its a disappointing one for familial reasons, he didn’t visit Dowlais. He visited the neighbouring, and competing, works at Cyfarthfa. This must have been a blow to the prestige of the Dowlais works and it was perhaps encouragement for the Guests to strive to make Dowlais the leading ironworks in the area, something they achieved within a few years of the visit.

lord-nelson-1
Admiral Nelson cut down on the deck of Victory… a bit like me looking for a link between him and Dowlais.

They were pioneers of the application of science to industry with the Dowlais works being hailed as “one of the World’s great industrial concerns” and receiving visits from leading scientists such as Michael Faraday only supports that view. Not as prestigious maybe as Admiral Nelson unless you view scientists as highly as you do military leaders.

I originally started this post to document a connection to a famous figure, someone everyone can relate to in some way or other, in the end it became about not presuming or getting welded to a certain idea or claim to fame. As someone trained in engineering a link to Faraday is every bit as exciting, let’s be honest when Albert Einstein has your picture on his wall alongside Isaac Newton, us mere mortals should acknowledge his importance too.

History is Murder

Much of the research into my family and those of my nearest and dearest has been mundane in the extreme, Agricultural labourers abound, no matter what part of the country they come from Ag Labs is a common occupation. As I’ve said before occasionally you come across a bit of a different story, a vicar, a boatman or in the case of my missus one of the Guests from Guest Keen and Nettlefold fame (more of that at a later date).

Today’s bit of excitement, if it isn’t too indelicate to call it that, comes from the Malaband side of my family and concerns the younger brother of my 4x Gt Grandmother Ann Rees.

Now young Edward Rees(Reece) was an Ag Lab, a simple sort of fellow born in Penterry, Monmouthshire as were all his siblings and both of his parents. Now none of this so far is unusual, generations would live and die in the same small village without much contact with the outside world beyond the occasional visit to the local market on market day, a lifetime governed by the seasons and the needs of the land. His life however ended with a short sharp drop, hung as a murderer, but that wasn’t the end of the story, a local am-dram society ‘Penterry Pantomaniacs’ 167 years later recreated the events in a play and a sequel to investigate whether Edward was indeed guilty of the crime he was executed for. Is this how you spell indelicate? (Kidding!)

Penterry websiteĀ 

PENTERRY IN THE 1840s
The Penterry of the 1841 census consisted of 9 inhabited houses with 20 male and 18 female inhabitants. John James and his family lived at Penterry Farm and other householders were Robert Brown, John Moxley, John Phillips, James Morgan, Richard Jones, Ann Reece, Jane Reece and another Ann Reece.
The Tithe Map of 1844 shows two major landowners, the Duke of Beaufort and Nathaniel Wells of Piercefield Park. Four other owners and 11 tenants are named.
Other sources of information are the church records with many names featuring in the Baptism, Marriage and Burial records as many lived in Penterry all their lives.

Back to Edward, born in 1817, the year Jane Austen had Northanger Abbey published, Waterloo Bridge was opened and the country was still recovering from war with Napoleon’s France, in Bombay HMS Trincomalee was launched, a ship that is still afloat as a museum ship in Hartlepool harbour the oldest British warship still afloat. I doubt Edward ever heard of Jane Austen, he certainly never visited London to see Waterloo bridge and beyond jokes about Boney and war stories from veterans of the wars against France I don’t think he thought too much about the state of the European political scene. The Reece family lived at Bantwm in 1841. Jane Reece was the head of her household, her husband, Edmund, having died in 1835. She lived with her children, Edmond and Nicholas, then aged 25, Edward aged 20 (all labourers) and her daughter, Elizabeth, aged 15. Jane is described on the census as a farmer and is listed as a tenant on the 1844 Tithe Map.Ā  (Age discrepancy was due to how the 1841 census was recorded, age being rounded to the nearest 5)

Church records show that Jane (nee Morgan) and Edmund were married at St. Maryā€™s Penterry on 17th August 1795. Nicholas, Edward and Elizabeth were all baptised at Penterry. Edward had married Betsy Jones the week before the murder. She had been in service in Bristol but had been taken ill and returned to live with her father and step-mother until she recovered. On meeting Reece who urged her to become his wife, she agreed on the understanding that she returned to service until they could afford to furnish a home. He assured her that he expected soon to receive a sum of money and they were married at St. Briavels on 27th November 1842.

Just a week later Mary Moxley was found battered to death in the lane outside her house at about one oā€™clock on the Saturday, having been seen and spoken to by various locals in the hours before her death. Beside the body was a heavy hedge stake which was stained with blood. Blood was also found in the house and along the path to the lane, suggesting that she had first been attacked inside.
When the news reached Chepstow, the police and John Moxley hurried to the spot and enquiries began. According to the press reports at the time which were never fully explained, John Moxley stated that he believed Edward Rees to be the murderer and the following day Edward and his wife were taken into custody. She would be later released.

THE MOXLEY FAMILY
John Moxley lived with his daughter, Mary, in a cottage alongside the road in Banton, Penterry. In 1842, he was about 60 years old, born about 1781 in Chapel Hill and his daughter was 37. Some 8 years previously, she had given birth to an illegitimate daughter, Ann, who was baptised in Penterry in 1834 and buried there in 1836 aged two.
John Moxley was listed as an owner and tenant of Nathaniel Wells on the Tithe Map of 1844. He owned his house and garden and rented some pasture land around the property. He also kept cows and pigs, some of which he had sold the week before. His neighbours might have been aware that he would have kept the money from the sale in his house.
His cottage was small and faced the lane which led from Fairoak to St. Arvans, some few hundred yards from Penterry Church. There were three or four other houses nearby.
He went regularly to Chepstow market on Saturdays which would also have been known by those who lived nearby. The Monmouthshire Merlin of the time refers to Moxley as ā€œan industrious man of frugal habits ā€¦.And his daughter of a similar disposition.ā€

At the time of the Moxley murder, a coroner was required to conduct an inquest, with a jury, into any suspicious death. He would hear evidence from witnesses and a verdict of unlawful killing was the equivalent of an indictment for murder. Publication of reports of these hearings was, as now, prohibited but a full account can be found in the Monmouthshire papers of the time!
The Monday after the murder, the inquest was held by the coroner, Mr. Brewer, and a great number of people were present. They first went to the Moxley cottage where the coroner and the jury ā€“ appointed from the local gentry present ā€“ viewed the body. Edward Reece, in custody, was brought forward and looked at the body, apparently with indifference, declaring that he knew nothing of the murder.
The crowd then adjourned to Red House (now known as Woodpecker Cottage) some few hundred yards away to continue the proceedings. It is believed that the inquest was held in a stone barn which stood next to the cottage as the size would have been more suitable for the occasion.
The inquest continued all day and on the following Thursday and Friday when a verdict of wilful murder was returned against Edward Reece who was committed for trial at the next County Assizes.

THE TRIAL
Monmouth was part of the Oxford Circuit and the next Assize court was held in April 1843. The accused at the time had no right to see a copy of the indictment to check the details and, as the accused had to pay for his own legal assistance or conduct his defence in person, it is likely that his counsel was assigned to him by the Judge. Thus, Mr. Keating would have learned about the case only from the evidence as it was given and was forced to consider his witnesses and line of defence as he went along. Perhaps this is why neither Reece nor his wife were called as witnesses. Perhaps Mr. Keating did his best after all.
Many witnesses were called by the prosecution but all could only offer circumstantial evidence. Mr. Keating summed up the case with a ā€œforcible and pathetic appealā€ according to the Monmouthshire Beacon.
The trial lasted the whole day from nine oā€™clock on Tuesday morning until the court rose at half-past one on the following morning. The jury took only from 11.20pm until 1 am to deliberate on such a complicated case and having found the accused guilty, he was sentenced to death by the Judge wearing his black cap.
Reece apparently showed little emotion at his fate and sat down resting his head on his hand.

THE EXECUTION

Reece received a final visit from his wife on the Saturday before the date set for his execution and she was carried from the room afterwards in a state of great distress having urged him to confess his guilt.
Having confessed his guilt to the prison governor at midnight on the Sunday, Reece was taken to the condemned cell where he apparently slept soundly. The Chaplain came to him at seven oā€™clock in the morning and prayed with him. He wrote two letters when he woke, one to his wife and one to his mother and received communion from the priest at 11 oā€™clock.
Then, his arms were pinioned behind his back and he was conducted in a procession to the scaffold. There, the rope was adjusted, the cap put on his head and he was allowed to address the crowd which he did at some length, thanking the Chaplain, the Governor and the turnkeys for their kindness. The cap was then ā€œpulled over his face, and as the drop fell and the town clock struck twelve, he made a convulsive clutch of the rope with his hands, which were immediately removed by the executioner; and although we could observe that life did not depart for some minutes, he did not appear to suffer much. Thus ended the life of Edward Reece.ā€ Monmouthshire Merlin 29.4.1843

THE CONFESSION

ā€œI went to John Moxleyā€™s house in disguise, and asked to light my pipe. Mary Moxley was in the house, and tried to push me out three times. She said she would have me taken up and sent to prison. Then we had a sharp scuffle, and she struck me with a hammer on the forehead. I then struck her on the head with a hacker. The same hacker was produced before the coroner on the Friday. I took the hedge-stake there to force open the door. I took the money, but I think it was more than what the old man said. I do not think he knew how much was taken. It was not my intention to kill her a quarter of an hour before it happened, and cannot tell what possessed me. I do not think the bank note is changed, but it is not in the possession of any of my family ā€“ perhaps it may be found, but I cannot tell you exactly where it is. I was in the place where Mr. Roberts saw me but some of the witnesses said more than was true; but I was the man who done the deed. I never took anything, nor hurted any person in my life before.ā€
Rees allegedly made this statement to the prison governor, Mr. Barrett, at midnight before his execution, having previously made a general admission of guilt a few hours earlier. Rees asked that it should not be made known until after his death.

Newspaper report of the execution of Edward Rees(Reece)

 

Time travelling in 2019

I’m relatively new to the genealogy research ‘game’, I’d dabbled a few times with immediate family and the free sites but that was about it. As I said before family rumours and whispers have always tantalised that there was something interesting in the past but no royalty or landed gentry have been found so far, neither has any international relations.

Some things that were laid down in stone have been challenged like all good tales passed down through generations, my wifes family were told that a gt gt grandfather had fought at Rourkes Drift, made famous in the Michael Caine film ‘Zulu’ . Through some trawling through army records and online medal sales I found out that he hadn’t fought in that famous battle, much to the joy of some family members…you know who you are ;o) however he was in South Africa at that time and his regiment had been ordered to reinforce the forces in KwaJimu as it was known in the Zulu language. They encountered elements of the Zulu army and were forced to make camp about 15 miles away, the war diary of the regiment records who they could hear the battle but were powerless to intervene, a story that seems to have grown in the telling.

My own family have supposed links to the Caribbean, something I havent been able to find so far, the way our name is spelt has also changed over the generations. The double T we all insist is important, really wasn’t when you consider it has swapped with its single T’d version at least twice in the records. Malaband, spelt with one L as a way to identify the family has been single L double L and began life as Mallabone, which brings me to the time travel.

Sometimes you luck into a situation, something wonderful will drop into your lap and you just have to thank whatever lead you to it and vice versa. In this case I was travelling along the Malaband/Mallabone branch line and came across another genealogist who had Robert Mallabone b. 1683 in their tree. However the information on their tree was Private and I had to request that they share the information, I had no great expectations beyond find a possible father for Robert or maybe just his children, imagine my suprise and delight when the very kind Sue (the ladies name) a distant cousin, sent me the following.

Robert Mallabone was christened in Nuneaton, Warwickshire 11 November 1683.

He was the second son of Robert Mallabone and Mary Morris.

He seems to have arrived as a bachelor in Berkswell from Arley by 1707, having been nominated as schoolmaster 14 May 1707 and licensed on 30 May of the same year. Below is his nomination by the parish council and license to teach grammar school by the Church of England.

May the 14th 1707 Memorandum that the day and yeare above written It is agreed between Mr Thomas Walker and the Parishioners of Berkswell That the said Thomas Walker shall resigne up and leave the Schooll of Berkswell he having been for sometyme School Master thereof In the weeke before Whitsunday next In consideration whereof the said Parisioners doe agree and promise to pay the said Thomas Walker the sum of Seeven pounds within the spase of one Month-next ensueing the day that he leaves the schooll Also the said Parishioners doe agree and promise to pay to Mr. Suffolke the sum of Tenne pounds in consideration of his service & Officiateing as Schooll Master for some tyme retained by the said Parishioners And the said parishioners doe all Unanimously agree upon and elect Robert Mallabone of Arley in the County of Warwick gent. to serve the said parish as Schooll Master for one yeare to commence from Whitsunday weeke next ensueing the date thereof And then to give such security at his dutys ende as the Counsell for the said Parishioners shall advise to remove from and leave the said schooll within halfe A yeare after notice given at the at the exepyration of the said first yeare the major part of the parishioners at a publik meeting of the said Parishioners upon A Monthly notice given in the church for the said meeting doe agree and order that the said Robert Mallabone shall resigne and leave the said schooll And the said parishioners doe agree and promise to pay the summe of Twentye markes by four payments in the yeare for every yeare that he shall officiate as Schooll Master there And proporsanably for a lesser tyme And in case the said Robert Mallabone should marry within the yeare commenceing from Whitsunday week as aforesaid He the said Robert Mallabone doeth agree & promise either to leave and resigne up the said schooll or otherwise to give securitye to indempnifye the said parish of Berkswell. Witnesse our hands the day and yeare aforesaid William Gibbs }Churchwardens Thomas Robinson I consent G. Smyth Tho. Walker to elect Mr. Mallabone Arth. Lugg Tho. Suffolk Schooll Master Geo. Dyall Robt. Mallabone & likewise to pay George Lugg _______________ him 20 marks per annum John Savage Junr. & allso 7li to Mr John Allen John Freeman Constable Walker & all the rest of the William Perkins Tho. Daffern Articles I disent Gilbert Dorker John Downes from witness Clement Banwell my hand John Bennett John Wolf Josiah Cates Lichfield 30 May 1707 Let Robert Mallabone be licensed to teach boys in the free grammar school established in the parish of Berkeswell, to which post he has been named by the parishioners of that place. Signed in our presence W. Walmirley Written by R. Ridersum N.P.

The Subscription Book of the Bishop of Lichfield and Canterbury indicates that Robert was ‘literate’ or ‘literatusā€ indicating that he did not possess a degree, but that he was judged by the bishop to possess sufficient learning to qualify for ordination.

The Berkswell School was housed in the Tower of the parish church, St. John the Baptist, in the room above the porch, a half timbered addition. The benches used by the children are still around the room as well as the pegs above for their hats.

On September 9, 1713, at the age of 29, Robert was ordained a deacon.

Two years later, on September 25, 1715 Robert was ordained a priest. In preparation for this, a letter testimonial was written and signed by four churchmen from neighboring parishes, the Master of the Hospital of Basall and several prominent laymen declaring his worthiness for the position. To all the faithful in Christ, to whom this present letter will have reached, Greetings. As is the custom in the ancient and venerable Church of England, that they who have joined probity of life with the study of letters should be adorned with honor, by the trusty public testimony of proper men; We the undersigned, witness that we have known Robert Mallabone, beloved in Christ, for the last three years, that his life and morals have been established piously and soberly, that he has diligently exhibited study in good letters, above all that his loyalty to their Majesties is manifest, also that he has never, as far as we know, held to anything that the Church of England does not approve of, and also that he especially defends its discipline, he distinguishes himself in all respects. To all this things we set our names plainly and with conviction. 5 September 1713. Ed. Hayward Vicar of Fillongly Charles Yardley Vicar of Corley William Wight Rector of Arley Moses Cotterell Vicar of Ansley Paul Lowe Master of the Hospital of Balsall George Smyth Gent. George Walker Dyall Gent. William Sleath

On September 11, 1718 Robert was appointed Curate of the Parish of Berkswell. As such he would have assisted Robert Boyce, rector of the parish.

Less than a year later, on August 25, 1719, Robert was appointed Vicar of Shustoke Parish and served there until his death on 14 October 1759.

The assignment also included the parish of Bentley which at one time had a small chapel which had long ceased to function when Robert was appointed Vicar of Shustoke. He would however, have administered the pastoral and ecclesiastical needs of Bentley Parish.

From 1721 to 1748, in addition to his duties as Vicar, Robert also acted as schoolmaster of the nearby English School founded by Thomas Huntbach of Shustoke in 1699. Here Robert taught about thirty pupils which would have included the children of both the Bentley and Shustoke Parishes.

In 1738 Robert was also licensed by Lord William Digby, as the Perpetual Curate of Over Whitacre. He served in this position until his death. Lord William Robert Mallabone appears by name in the charity accounts of Over Whitacre receiving an annual sum for ā€œteaching six poor Children to write and Readā€ from 1742-1746. This was probably in his capacity as master of the English School.

From 1749 until his death in 1758 Robert is listed as the minister who made the charitable distributions. One interesting entry is a charitable gift of three shillings made Christmas Day 1744 to purchase ā€œa Duty of Manā€ for ā€œMrs. Mallaboneā€™s maid.ā€ Besides performing christenings, marriages, burials and distributing alms to the poor, Robert also saw to the maintenance and repair of the church.

In 1736 the Treble Bell in St. Cuthbertā€™s tower was recast at the foundry of William Brooke, of Broomsgrove, Birmingham. The inscription on the recast bell was in the form of a rhyming couplet and reads: Mr. Robert Mallabone Vicar, as I do tell, And Josias Allen, Churchwarden, when I was made a bell. W.B. Bromsgrove.

1736 Robert and his family would no doubt have lived in the Vicarage in Shustoke that stood on the site of the house now known as The Old Vicarage, a large house situated to the left of the drive that leads to the church of St. Cuthbertā€™s with the church farm on the right. Here Robert and Sarah reared their seven children.

At least four of these children died as young adults.

No Mallabone gravestones survive in the churchyard of St. Cuthbertā€™s.
The graves of both Robert Sr. and his son Robert were reportedly located within the Nave of the church and marked by inscribed stone slabs laid in the floor. It is generally believed that these slabs were destroyed during the disastrous fire of 1 June 1886 caused by a lightning strike on the church.
Ref Jeanette Hurst

As you can see it doesnt answer the questions I thought it might but it does bring a life lived 300 years ago right into the present day. The documents transcribed within it are windows into the past, showing how a young man matured into an adult and became a pillar of his community.Ā  It also opens a whole new area for research, is the church still there, does the bell still exist, neither of which I had any idea about this morning.

As part of his work this man hatched, matched and dispatched hundreds if not thousands of people, he played a huge part in peoples lives for decades and even had his name cast in a bell! Yet until today his story was unknown to a branch of his family, his name forgotten, his surname mutated beyond memory but still he survived all of this and his story eventually resurfaced and transfixed his 9x gt grandson….

 

A chip Offlow the old block

I’ve been doing some genealogy recently, looking backwards through time at where I come from. It’s been a fascinating thing to do, I knew bits and pieces from grandparent’s tales, but you only tend to get the interesting bits that are part of family folklore and sometimes the devil is in the details that are either forgotten or buried through some sense of shame.

Late 19th century image of some Gt x grandfather on their boat at a wharf somewhere on a river. Not much is known as you can tell.

I have found the promised connections to a major canal carrying company, Samuel Barlow’s through a Gt Gt Grandmother, a Gt Nan whose Birth certificate states proudly under Birthplace “A Boat, On the canal at Fazeley, Tamworth’Ā  But I’ve also found stuff that was unmentioned beyond whispers of not talking about it because it was too upsetting.

Family members who fought and sadly died in both World Wars, photos seen as a child that I wasn’t allowed to talk about, young men in uniform who would never grow old. Gt Uncles who never had time to create their own family tree branches, it has really brought me closer to who I am, not an easy thing to do. Still searching for international connections, but it might be they are still to come in earlier generations.

A small section of the 1939 census from Old Birchills, you can see Ernie Thomas is listed as well as the Foster and Moore families both well known on the BCN.

As part of the research old census returns have been most helpful, they take a bit of getting used to and you are relying on your ancestors literacy and also the spelling ability of the person recording the details… not always as accurate as you’d think for an official recorder.

The details recorded on the census forms are mainly about individuals, address, relationship, where born and occupation. Every item is a doorway into the past, you can see how many people lived in the houses, small two bed terraced houses with three generations living in them often with 5 or 6 kids. It’s times like that you realise Charlie and the Chocolate Factory was accurate in the description of Charlie’s family situation, people would have been top and tailing on a bed, if they even had a bed. In some cases it was probably sacking full of straw covered by whatever clothes they had to try and keep warm and comfortable. You see occupations handed down from father to son, Brushmakers passed through 3 generations on one branch,Ā  cordwainers (posh shoemakers) is a popular one in a branch of my family, white smiths (tin wear makers(plates, cups etc)) was another along with the ubiquitous miners of various materials and Ag Labs or agricultural labourers, women were often silk winders if they weren’t listed as unpaid domestic duties or in quite a few cases domestic servants to other families, often being a servant not to a wealthy family but to another family in a similar situation to their own, the work they did being paid for with board and lodgings seemingly to get them out of the family home and off the family ‘payroll’.

Another part of the census was the districts the people lived in, alongside the more recognisable areas such as Walsall or Walsall Foreign (Explained here on The Bloxwich Telegraph) there was another area often listed on the headers of the census sheets, that of The hundred of Offlow. Now I have to admit I’d not heard of it before, I have heard of the Chiltern Hundreds, that fabled place MPs go to when they want to resign their seat. It turns out ‘Hundreds’ are an ancient way of dividingĀ a shire for military and judicial purposes under the common law (Thanks wikipedia) and Offlow Hundred comes from Offa, the chap with the Dyke and hlaw meaning a mound or high place.

More details on Offlow can be found on wiki hereĀ including details of the origin of hundreds under Alfred the Great and Offlows inclusion in the Domesday book.

My reason for this post comes from the great map I found online marking the boundaries of the hundred, it dates from 1610 and many of the place names are still recognisable if a little different.

Its not just the facts it contains but it’s the sheer art that it conveys from the map maker, here was someone who really had a skill, the penmanship is a joy to behold. I love old maps but I dont really know much about them, having found the map I looked up Offlow on wiki where the map was again reproduced as an illustration this time with the maker listed as John Speed. Now I would love to say I leapt from my chair shouting Eureka as the name was already known to me but alas, I cant. What I can say however is that a simple Google soon informed me that he is probably the most famous of British map makers, I think its easy to see why this was the case, if you want more information on him this is a great place to start. If you are feeling flush you could even buy an original map of Staffordshire drawn by his fair hand…or a copperplate of one anyway, they are certainly things of beauty.

Vanishing crane

Back in the early 80’s we had our narrow boat out of the water at Birchills, the old Ernie Thomas’ yard, I wrote in more detail about this yard here. Nice and local for us to do maintenance on the hull including painting it with blacking (a tarry substance put onto boat hulls to protect them from rust) and caulking the join between the iron hull and the wooden top. Caulking is when you get a length of old rope and unpick it into a looser, thinner strand and hammer it into the join between two planks or in our case the iron and wooden join. This was an old skill well known to wooden boat builders of all hues and creates a watertight seal once the planks expand when wet. My Granddad was an old boatman and his whole family were well known on the BCN working for different carriers and boatyards so it was a skill he picked up during his working life and as a 12/13 year old I learnt from him how to do it.

Now these jobs, caulking and blacking, were usually done in a dry dock, thats a bit like a lock where you take the boat in but instead of taking you down to a lower level the water runs out and the boat sits on blocks so you can do work on the hull. In our case my granddad knew this crane was available and as far as I know free, which was probably the best bit for him, so he could get the boat onto the bank and do the work needed.

Now the crane was in Birchills, it was about 30 ft high, had two arms which reached out over the canal and had a hoist on each arm that ended in a cradle. These cradles would be sunk into the canal and the boat then floated over them, the cradles were then raised out of the water bringing the boat with them.Ā  It was a really simple and efficient way of docking single boats at a time and must have been installed at the end of Thomas’ working period. Earlier photographs show extensive docking facilities of the traditional kind with side slips and movable sheds for cover. As seen bottom right on this image from the wonderful Britain from Above website.

A more general shot of the yard, the dock is front right. Empty boats awaiting orders or docking can be seen moored on the main line with a loaded boat heading for Birchills top lock to work its way down towards Pleck and maybe beyond.

The crane was totally hand powered, with large chains slung around the drums which controlled the length of cable that the cradles were hung from. Blocks and tackles reduced the effort needed to raise the easily 10-15 tonne boat to something a youth such as I could do, the only drawback was each cradle ran on a separate drum so two people had to coordinate what they were doing to ensure the boat came out level and was sat on the land trucks the same.

The trucks were like larger versions of the cradles, each one had four wheels and ran on rails, or used to, by the time we used them the shed they ran into was in use by a different business so the trucks were basically used as supports while the work was done.

I didn’t understand why we were so rushed to get the work finished on our boat, we had moored at Birchills for a few years, the crane wasn’t busy in fact we were the only people to use it in that time, so I couldn’t understand the rush to get the boat out docked and back in the water. The reason was clarified the day after we got the boat back in the water, inspectors arrived to cut down the crane they had condemned the week before we used it.

Now we come to the vanishing part, there are no photos of this crane that I and other researchers have managed to find. In fact there are some who have doubted its existence, thinking I have it confused with the yard crane that was a lot smaller and situated near the dry dock alongside Ernie Thomas’ house. Are there any readers out there who may have memories of this large crane, even better with any photos?
I have checked Jack’s (Haddock) archives online through the clickintime website and nada… over to you.

Walsall royalty

QUEEN was launched in 1917 and constructed by an unknown builder. The first owners of this narrow boat were Hildick & Hildick of Walsall and she was originally named WALSALL QUEEN.

queen
Walsall Queen after sale to A. Harvey Taylor and renaming to Queen, this image shows her just after some serious dock work and the rams head has been removed.

BCN Distance tables show Hildicks works, the tube works that is, as on the Walsall Canal, near Pleck, through discussion with Nick Hildick-Smith a descendant of the Hildicks I received this potted history of the firm

Moore Hildick became a file and iron square manufacturer, like his father, and conducted business in Wolverhampton Road, Walsall (Whites Trade Directory of Warwickshire 1834).

However, Mona Hildick-Smithsā€™ letter says:

ā€œ My Great Grandfather (Moore) Hildick had a large flour mill and he wanted my Grandfather John to take it over- but the flour upset my grandfathers chest so an iron and steel tube works was started for himā€

Moore married Sarah Wood on 9/8/1821 at St Matthew’s, Walsall . They lived in Walsall, in Wolverhampton Road, and had 6 (or 7) children.

Benjamin b1822 c 8/5/1822

Joseph Moore b1823 c 15/10/1823

John b1825 c 31/3/1825

Sarah b1826 c 1/1/1827

Moore* b1828 c 4/6/1828

Elizabeth b1830 c 24/3/1830

Martha b1841 (This not proven but comes from a source through Genesreunited.)

All the children were christened at St Matthew’s Church, Walsall. The two eldest boys obviously inherited the file manufacturers as John became a grocer. This is at odds with the information in Monas letter who says he was in the iron and steel tube business.

The following has again been found recently and refers to the iron businesses in Walsall in the 19C:

ā€œSeveral other works were set up in the mid 19th century. In 1855 Edward Russell opened the large Alma Tube Works on land leased from Lord Bradford at the corner of Rollingmill and Wharf Streets. (Footnote 65) By 1860 it had passed to John Russell & Co. of Wednesbury. (Footnote 66) The company continued to occupy the works until 1929 when Stewarts & Lloyds took over Russells and closed it. (Footnote 67) In 1860 another firm, Brown & Chesterton, was making tubes in Station Street, but by 1873 it was concentrating on gasfittings and chandeliers. (Footnote 68) Three more works opened in the 1870s. (Footnote 69) George Gill, manager of the Alma works in 1872, and a Mr. Hildick had by 1876 established the Walsall Tube Works on the north side of the Cyclops Ironworks in Pleck Road. (Footnote 70) Gill left the partnership c. 1879 and the firm became Hildick, Mills & Hildick. (Footnote 71) The style changed to Hildick & Hildick in 1884. (Footnote 72) About 1876 A. C. and J. G. Russell, trading as Russell Bros., opened the Bradford Tube Works in Upper Brook Street. (Footnote 73) The firm became Russell Bros. (Walsall) Ltd. at some time between 1917 and 1920. (Footnote 74) About 1880 George Gill had joined with T. A. Russell to establish the Cyclops Tube Works on that part of the Cyclops Ironworks site flanking Wharf Street. (Footnote 75) The firm became Gill & Russell Ltd. in 1911. (Footnote 76)ā€

 

From: ‘Walsall: Economic history’, A History of the County of Staffordshire: Volume XVII: Offlow hundred (part) (1976), pp. 180-208. URL: http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=36193. Date accessed: 01 June 2005. Notes relate to source documents, mostly meeting minutes and can be seen at the web site.

It should be noted that I have found references to Hildick and Hildick trading in the Birmingham area up to the mid 1940ā€™s and a recent contact with Greta Morley (nee Hildick) whose father Howard, a son of John Hildick (1857), ran the company until its demise in the 1950s, has clarified some details.

I think therefore the Tube Works came into being in around 1876 but became Hildick and Hildick in 1884. As far as I can tell from a short conversation with Greta (who died recently (2013)) the two Hildicks concerned were Benjamin and Joseph shown in the tree extract above. I descend from John the third brother who was mostly a farmer at Lapworth but who did serve as Mayor of Walsall in the late 1800ā€™s. I am sure that the two brothers died without issue and all the works passed to Johns son also called John. When this John died in around 1912, his son Howard (Gretas father) took over the company and it ran in various guises until the mid 1950ā€™s. The only snippet re the boats was that the company was having great difficulty in getting sufficient canal carriers to transport their pipes that they decided to make a small fleet of their own. It appears that very few were made as they only created them for company business reasons and presumably with the onset of rail and road transport were sold off when no longer required.

It was around 1917 that Hildicks had their boats built and maybe the war was a consideration, at that time it was stalemate on the western front and war production must have been taking over everything, Hildicks were iron and steel tube manufacturers so I imagine they would have had quite a bit of production aimed towards the war effort.

A 1916 advert for Hildick and Hildick from Graces Guide

Walsall Queen was paired with a butty boat called Sybil and both were sold to A. Harvey Taylors in 1924, they also had Colin and Iris of AHT but they came via Nicholsons a firm in the London area. According to Chris Leah of Wooden Canal Boat Society Hildicks also had a butty called “Queen of the Ocean” , which together with their motor “Whitehall” was sold to John Boyes of Hillmorton in about 1923. “Queen of the Ocean” was later traded in for the “Victoria” at Tooleys and on John Boyes death in 1935 were sold to Harvey Taylor, becoming the “Leon” and “Rose”

Walsall Queen was constructed of wood; transverse elm bottom, iron knees and carvel sides. She was purchased by A. Harvey-Taylor in 1924 and re-registered as QUEEN at Tring. Her original engine was replaced at this time with a Bolinder semi diesel. She was abandoned in 1947, then sold as a pleasure boat in 1949. Abandoned again in 1986, she was rescued as a houseboat. In 1993, she sank and was left at Denham. The following year, British Waterways donated the boat to the Wooden Canal Craft Trust (now the Wooden Canal Boat Society Limited) who raised her and moved her 200 miles to Runcorn for preservation.

queen1
Walsall Queen having been wrongly identified as Fellows Morton and Claytons Queen, rescued by WCBS she is here on her journey from Denham on the Grand Union to Portland Basin nr Manchester.

She rests now at The Portland Basin Museum, Ashton-under-Lyne where she is the last survivor of the Hildick & Hildick fleet with a hull unaltered from its original construction.

WCBS are raising funds towards the restoration/rebuilding of Walsall Queen, hopefully this centenarian lady could one day grace the canals of Walsall once again, how great would that be.

When is a culvert not a culvert?..

When its a ruddy great hole in the ground of course, top bloke and local boater Springy has sent me some images of the works at Teeces Bridge, Little Bloxwich and works is the right word for them. The culvert is now a trench from one side of the cut to the other with just the ends remaining, as you can see on his photos the culvert was of double layer brick construction built completely round and probably hasn’t seen light of day since being built 224 years ago or something close to it. The stone seen in my previous blog postĀ Surveying the kingdomĀ has been used to create a ramp/roadway for the tracked excavator that’s on site and creating the hole.

There are now 5 pumps running according to Springy 3 transferring water from Pelsall side to the Walsall side and two which are keeping the work site as water free as possible, as you can see from the images the flow from Chasewater is bringing the surface muck on the canal down to the dam.

 

With the works planned to be completed by July 6th they are cracking on which is lovely to see and after discovering the leak we can have few complaints about the progress made so far. I love the detail Springy managed to get of the brick culvert before it is replaced, I think the guys have probably been too busy to keep a photographic record themselves which is a shame as it would have been interesting to see exactly what the damage was before it was cleared away.

I feel an enquiry to Severn Trent coming on…

Hindsight eh

I was going to write today how with hindsight I may have been a bit unreasonable towards CRT yesterday, it wasnt so much confusion as the confusing manner of the stoppage notices which got me goat. Id spent the day reading about the various stoppages round the system and was in a bad mood with much ire aimed at senior managers within CRT. I probably was harsh on them and I apologise, today Ive been told the Church Bridge stoppage is now off again and will happen as originally planned in November. This decision was made because having both stoppages at the same time would mean a large section of canal was closed and a big diversion in place. Its really pleasing to see such common sense being utilised about this.

Im not going to moan about this because it was what I mentioned yesterday and it does now mean the W&E is back available as a through route if boaters are willing to travel along the Walsall cut. Personally I think its a great bit of canal, like all urban canals it has its problems with rubbish and ASB but they are not as serious as we might think, if it happens to you its awful and off putting but its nothing new. Indeed 30 odd years ago it wasnt unknown for boaters to carry their own half enders and whatever to lob back at the kids if they offered the same towards the boats, Ive been dropped off at a few points as a youth and told to chase off some of the offenders, not something Id recommend to be honest.

99 times out of a hundred there is no trouble at all travelling these canals, a friendly smile and wave goes a long way, and they offer some of the best views of industrial archaeology and the changing faces of city/brownfield sites you will see. Yes there are stretches where the locals have little regard for the canal but it also has sections that are simply beautiful and planners and developers have made great improvements and really brought the canalside back into use. Brownhills Bob is a huge advocate of canals as a leisure resource, he comes at it from a cycling position as opposed to my boating one but thats the beauty of canals, there is room for us all as long as we are prepared to be considerate and thoughtful. Ive cycled, walked fished and boated most of the BCN at various times and it amuses me how sometimes we each see “our” group as somehow superior and having the priority when it comes to canals. As a boater I have to remember its 2018 not 1918, commercial carrying is finished, canals are now leisure based which means we can all use them on level footing, as long as there’s water in them of course.

CRTs latest drive “Making life better by water” is a positive one I think, it will raise awareness of canals as a leisure resource for cyclists and walkers and hopefully will bring a bit more respect to the canals and boaters from those who at the moment just see them as somewhere for mischief, as evidenced at Ryders Green locks this morning

As a result of this childish moronic behaviour Ryders Green Locks are closed overnight (4pm-8am) as per this notice.

The damage caused is superficial it seems but it reduces the attractiveness of the whole area.

https://twitter.com/BashirMbe/status/1007242970179997696

I can only think that CRT staff are in attendance during the day to ensure safe passage, otherwise I would have thought the anti idiot keys on the paddles would be enough… although somehow the idiots must have bypassed them last night it seems.

Lets hope CRTs message of hope about canals can penetrate those responsible and they find a new way to enjoy the waterside, one that doesn’t cause problems for others.

Get out there and enjoy the towpaths, get a fishing rod and licence and enjoy the wildlife, better still get away on a boat and truly experience a different way of life and see what people like me rave about.

Its well worth it.

Confusion reigns at CRT

I have no intention of making this blog another attack CRT blog, theres enough of those out there, however their latest notice regarding Teeces Bridge/Little Bloxwich W&E closure is full of conflicting information.

Teeces Bridge (Stoney Lane Little Bloxwich) Wyrley & Essington Canal

Notice Details

From Date:
2nd June 2018 at 13:00
To Date:
6th July 2018 at 18:00 inclusive
Type:
Navigation Closure
Reason:
Structure failure
Notice updates:
13/06/2018 @ 15:17

Following the emergency closure at Teeces Bridge, we expect the repair works here to be completed by 6thĀ July.

We have also contacted the Third Party contractors, Bagnalls (for Cadent Gas) to see if we could work together to bring forward their planned November winter works at Church Bridge, Wednesfield to coincide with this unexpected closure of the navigation.Ā  As a result, we are pleased to confirm this closure will now be carried out from 18thĀ June ā€“ 6thĀ July.Ā  This will avoid having a further stoppage on the navigation in the winter.Ā  A separate notice will be issued for these works.

07/06/2018 @ 16:21

Further to the below notice, Severn Trent have accepted ownership of the culvert and are undertaking repair works.

Whilst the towpath remains open, banksman will manage users through the works as and when necessary.

Description:

A culvert that runs below the canal has collapsed and the level of the canal is continuing to drop so we need to isolate the section with the leak to protect the remainder of the canal.

 

Please note the Northern and Southern Sections of the canal are all open and can be accessed via the Tame Valley and Rushall Canals or either the Walsall canal or Wolverhampton Main line.

 

 

Location:

Wyrley & Essington Canal
Starts At:
Teeces Bridge
Ends At:
Teeces Bridge
Up Stream Winding Hole:
North of Teeces Bridge use the junction with the Cannock Extension Canal
Down Stream Winding Hole:
South of Teeces Bridge use Birchills Junction

While it is great news they plan for the waterway to be back open by 6th July, in time for school holidays, their information about Church Bridge in Wednesfield would seem to indicate the canal is no longer opened from the main line through to Walsall.

If the works at Wednesfield necessitate a closure as they seem to suggest they need to change the information about the W&E being open from the main line immediately as any boat getting that far would have quite a way to reverse to wind when they come across the stoppage.

The stoppage notice has been issued and the W&E is indeed closed at Church Bridge.

Church Bridge, Wednesfield, Wyrley & Essington

Notice Details

From Date:
18th June 2018 at 08:00
To Date:
6th July 2018 at 16:00 inclusive
Type:
Navigation Closure
Reason:
3rd Party Works
Is Towpath Closed?
Yes
Description:

Third Party contractors, Bagnalls, will be carrying out works to this pipe bridge on behalf of Cadent Gas.Ā  This will require the installation of scaffolding which will necessitate closure of theĀ navigation.

Following the emergency closure on the Wyrley & Essington Canal at Teeces Bridge, we contacted Bagnalls to see if we could work together to bring forward their November winter works at Church Bridge, Wednesfield.Ā  As a result, we are pleased to confirm this closure will now be carried outĀ during 18th June to 6th July.Ā  This will avoid having a further closure on the navigationĀ this winter.

Location:

Wyrley & Essington Canal
Starts At:
Trapmakers Bridge
Ends At:
Rookery Bridge
Up Stream Winding Hole:
Bridge at Basin Junction
Down Stream Winding Hole:
Wednesfield Junction Turnover Bridge

 

A boater would know this and realise the glaring error, be interesting to know is the person writing these notices has much experience on boats and canals or just reading a map even, its not good either way.

In retrospect and reading them carefully what they say is technically correct, I feel it needs clarification from them however to ensure people who dont know the area have a full understanding. While technically the canals are open other than the two very short lengths described, there is no through route on the W&E from Wolverhampton or Walsall or Pelsall, you CAN use the Daw End canal and head down Rushall locks from Pelsall side, you CAN use the Walsall canal to get as far as Birchills really and you can access Bentley Bridge from Wolverhampton side but you cannot do all of those together at this point.

 

Hope that is a bit clearer.

Once more unto the breach…

Reports are coming in about another canal breach, this time on the Leeds and Liverpool canal nr Maghull just outside Liverpool, contractors are dumping rubble and soil in narrows to try and slow the flow but its all being washed away so far. Boats are grounded and a huge amount of water is flooding local fields according to photos on facebook.Ā https://www.facebook.com/groups/1407105596036513/permalink/1722259847854418/

Its unclear if this is near the site of the 1994 breach detailed below but sadly as explained in the text below with their being no locks between Stanley Dock and BurscoughĀ  Appley Bridge (being the next lock with Birscough being a lock down onto the Rufford branch, Thanks to Michael in the comments below) a huge amount of water is being released from the canal.

“The reason so much water escaped is that there are no locks between Stanley Dock in Liverpool and Burscough in West Lancashire, many miles away. In effect all the water between Liverpool and Burscough was trying to leave the canal via the breach which was roughly half way between the two.

I recall watching what was then British Waterways (now the Canal & River Trust) desperately trying to stop the flow by dumping rubble into the canal at Bells Lane and it being washed away by the force of the water.”

https://tonyrobertson.mycouncillor.org.uk/tag/maghull-canal-breach/

I understand that the breach occurred after 6.30 this evening as eye witnesses say that all was fine as they walked along the stretch at that time, the only disturbance some kids swimming in the canal, seems like they had a lucky break.

As photos in the local facebook group show the water loss is serious and CRT are struggling to get a hold on the loss,Ā  it doesn’t seem as if Stop planks are kept close to the stop places and as can be seen tipper trucks are dropping tons of rubble to try and save some of the water. Latest reports say sand bags are being dropped in.

CRT are reporting that a culvert has failed that heads over the field towards Brewery Lane (I wonder if from the Alt)Ā The water from the canal is escaping down the culvert, flooding the fields and Brewery Lane.Ā They have dammed one side trying to sort the Liverpool side pouring clay in to dam it.Ā Someone is coming out to rescue the fish and wildlife.

Culvert 29 (Nr. Burscough) – Leeds & Liverpool Canal

Notice Details

From Date:
13th June 2018
To Date:
until further notice
Type:
Navigation Closure
Reason:
Structure failure
Notice updates:
13/06/2018 @ 09:36

The Leeds & Liverpool Canal is currently closed to navigation between Bridges 9C (Ledson’s Bridge) inĀ Bridge 10 (Holmes Swing Bridge) due to aĀ suspected collapsed culvert (No. 29) near Melling / Burscough.

Engineers are on site completing investigations and an update will be issued later today.

Description:

The Leeds & Liverpool Canal is currently closed to navigation at Bridge 10 (Holmes Swing Bridge) due to aĀ collapsed culvert (No. 29) near Burscough.

An update will be issued later today.

Location:

Leeds & Liverpool Canal
Starts At:
Bridge 9C, Ledson’s Bridge, Melling
Ends At:
Bridge 10, Holmes Swing Bridge

 

As you can see from the following photos kindly provided by local, Les Nolan, the flooding is extensive and includes local houses with at least one boat caught in the damaged section and left high and dry.

 

 

Brewery Lane has now been closed due to the flooding.

It seems as if there has been a problem for a while in this area, locals reported a very strong smell in the last week coming from the area of the culvert and there is a quote from local farm owner in the Liverpool Echo

The 58-year-old told the ECHO: “We’ve reported a fault with the canal and a persistent damp patch, even in dry weather, for some time now.

“We have reported it consistently and not been believed.”

 

A fish rescue is taking place at lunchtime onĀ  13.6.2018.

Images sent in by local Traci Googel, show the Liverpool side down about 2ft. Traci took these pics while walking her grandson to school along the stretch of canal between Cooksons bridge and the blue bridge by Hatton hill Litherland, which is approx 4km from the breach site by canal.

This whole episode does not seem to paint the area CRT management in a great light, reported leak which has failed despite numerous warnings, maybe and this is a wild thought, but maybe it would be best to have managers and a workforce who know what they are doing. Maybe the time is right for a refocusing on the core business and away from outside investments because without water, a canal is a stinking muddy ditch that NO ONE will feel better by.

Update 13.6.2018

The coffer dams are going in the usual scaffold and WPM jobs which should allow the sections either side of the breach to be rewatered.